Critique of Restoration Tragedy
Q. Write a critical note on Restoration Tragedy with reference to any two dramatists
Answer: Restoration Tragedy refers to a genre of English theater that emerged during the Restoration period in the late 17th century. This era marked the reopening of theaters after a lengthy ban during the Puritan rule. While Restoration Comedy was known for its wit and satire, Restoration Tragedy took a different path, focusing on exaggerated emotions, moral ambiguity, and sensationalism. Despite its popularity during the time, Restoration Tragedy has often been criticized for its superficiality and lack of depth. Two notable dramatists of this era, John Dryden and Thomas Otway, exemplify some of the shortcomings of this genre.
John Dryden, a prominent figure in Restoration Tragedy, wrote plays like "The Conquest of Granada" and "All for Love." While Dryden was a skilled poet and playwright, his works often lacked true emotional depth and relied heavily on sensationalism. In "The Conquest of Granada," for example, the characters are driven by grand passions and extreme emotions, but their motivations are often shallow and unrealistic. The characters lack psychological complexity and are primarily defined by their exaggerated actions and reactions. This emphasis on spectacle and artificiality detracts from any genuine exploration of human nature and fails to resonate with audiences on a deeper level.
Another dramatist, Thomas Otway, is known for his play "Venice Preserved." While the play is considered one of the finest examples of Restoration Tragedy, it still reflects the flaws of the genre. "Venice Preserved" revolves around themes of political conspiracy and personal betrayal, but the characters and their actions often come across as implausible and melodramatic. The dialogue frequently employs heightened language and over-the-top expressions of emotion, creating a sense of theatricality that veers into the realm of absurdity. As a result, the play lacks the psychological realism and subtlety that can make tragedy truly powerful and thought-provoking.
One of the main criticisms of Restoration Tragedy is its preoccupation with spectacle and artificiality over genuine emotional engagement. The characters are often more like caricatures, driven by exaggerated passions and external circumstances, rather than complex individuals grappling with internal conflicts. The plays prioritize the dramatic and sensational, aiming to entertain and captivate audiences, but at the expense of meaningful exploration of human nature and moral dilemmas. The themes and conflicts presented in Restoration Tragedy are often simplistic and lack the depth and nuance found in the works of earlier tragic playwrights like Shakespeare or the Greek tragedians.
In conclusion, Restoration Tragedy, as exemplified by the works of dramatists like John Dryden and Thomas Otway, is often criticized for its superficiality and lack of psychological realism. The genre's emphasis on spectacle, sensationalism, and artificiality detracts from its ability to offer genuine insight into the human condition. While Restoration Tragedy enjoyed popularity during its time, it falls short in comparison to the depth and complexity of earlier tragic works.
*****
Read also:
👉 Anglo-Saxon Elegy or Old English Lyric Poetry
👉 Anglo Saxon Christian Poetry or Religious Poetry
👉 Beowulf, as a heroic epic poem
👉 Middle English Allegorical Poetry
👉 Christopher Marlowe - contribution to the development of English drama
0 Comments
I'm pleased to hear from you. Without any hesitation, kindly leave your valuable words in the Comment Box