Cultural Materialism and New Historicism: How they differ?

Cultural Materialism and New Historicism: How they differ?

Q. How Cultural Materialism differs from New Historicism as a critical approach?

Answer: Cultural Materialism and New Historicism are both critical approaches within literary and cultural studies, but they differ in their theoretical foundations and emphasis. While they share some similarities, they have distinct perspectives on the relationship between literature, culture, and history.

👉  Cultural Materialism and its features

1. Material Conditions and Power Structures:

   - Cultural Materialism, associated with scholars like Raymond Williams and Jonathan Dollimore, emphasizes the importance of material conditions and power structures in shaping literature and culture.

   - It examines how economic, social, and political factors influence the production and reception of literary works.

2. Base and Superstructure:

   - Cultural Materialism is influenced by Marxist theory, particularly the idea of a base (material conditions such as the economy and social structure) and superstructure (cultural and ideological expressions such as literature).

   - It explores how the economic and social base influences the superstructure, including literature.

3. Ideological Critique:

   - Cultural Materialism engages in ideological critique, analyzing how dominant ideologies are reflected and contested in literary texts.

   - It often focuses on issues of class struggle, power dynamics, and social inequality.

👉  New Historicism and its features

1. Historical Context and Textual Analysis:

   - New Historicism, associated with scholars like Stephen Greenblatt and Michel Foucault, also considers the historical context of literary works but does not prioritize material conditions as much as Cultural Materialism.

   - It emphasizes the interdependence of literature and history, suggesting that both shape and reflect each other.

2. Power and Discourse:

   - New Historicism pays special attention to power dynamics and the ways in which power operates through discourse and cultural artifacts.

   - It draws on Foucauldian ideas, examining how institutions and discourses shape knowledge and influence cultural production.

3. Multiplicity of Voices:

   - Unlike Cultural Materialism, New Historicism often focuses on the multiplicity of voices and perspectives, including marginalized or subaltern voices.

   - It is interested in the ways different social groups negotiate and contest power within a historical context.

👉  Differences between Cultural Materialism differs from New Historicism

1. Emphasis on Material Conditions:

   - Cultural Materialism places a stronger emphasis on material conditions, economic structures, and class dynamics as key determinants in the production of literature.

2. Interdependence vs. Material Determinism:

   - New Historicism sees literature and history as interdependent, with each influencing and shaping the other. Cultural Materialism, while acknowledging interdependence, tends to lean towards a more deterministic view of material conditions shaping culture.

3. Approach to Ideology:

   - Cultural Materialism explicitly engages in an ideological critique, often focusing on class struggle. New Historicism, while acknowledging ideological influences, may have a broader approach that includes considerations of power, discourse, and multiplicity of voices.

In summary, while both Cultural Materialism and New Historicism explore the connections between literature and the broader cultural and historical context, they differ in their theoretical foundations, emphasis on material conditions, and their approach to ideology and power dynamics.

*****

Read also:

👉 Preface to the Lyrical Ballads | a manifesto of the Romantic literary movement  

👉 Aristotle's View of ‘Mimesis’ | How is the term different from that of Plato?  

👉 Doing as One Likes | Matthew Arnold’s view upon English Aristocratic Class  

👉 Politics and the English Language by George Orwell | 'political writing is bad writing'  

👉 On Gusto | William Hazlitt’s view on Michael Angelo’s forms and Titian’s landscapes  

👉 T. S. Eliot’s concept of the Impersonal theory of poetry 

👉 Aristotle's Poetics | views on the plot of tragedy and its relative importance