Otto Jespersen: English language as masculine

Otto Jespersen: English language as masculine

Q. Why does Jespersen describe the English language as masculine?

Answer: Otto Jespersen, a Danish linguist, described the English language as masculine primarily due to the grammatical features and characteristics that he believed reflected masculine qualities. In his book "Growth and Structure of the English Language" published in 1905, Jespersen argued that English displayed more masculine traits compared to other languages. However, it is essential to note that Jespersen's views were shaped by the societal norms and gender roles prevalent during his time, which influenced his perspective on language.

One of the main reasons Jespersen associated English with masculinity was its grammatical structure. English, like many other Indo-European languages, has gendered pronouns, where the third-person singular pronouns "he" and "his" are traditionally used to refer to both generic individuals and males. Jespersen believed that this characteristic reflected a preference for the masculine gender, as the pronouns "he" and "his" were more frequently employed than gender-neutral alternatives.

Besides, Otto Jespersen observed that English possessed a greater number of strong, forceful, and assertive words compared to other languages. He argued that the vocabulary of English was replete with words denoting power, aggression, and dominance, which he associated with masculine characteristics. Examples of such words include "dominate," "conquer," and "command." Jespersen believed that this rich lexicon of forceful words contributed to the masculine quality of the English language.

Jespersen also pointed out that English, unlike some other languages, did not assign gender to inanimate objects through grammatical agreement. In languages such as French or Spanish, nouns are assigned gender, with masculine and feminine forms. Jespersen argued that the absence of grammatical gender in English made it more straightforward and less nuanced, aligning it with masculine traits that are often associated with directness and simplicity.

It is important to recognize that Jespersen's characterization of English as masculine is subjective and influenced by the societal norms and gender roles prevalent during his time. Language itself does not inherently possess gender; rather, gender associations are socially constructed and can vary across different cultures and historical periods. Linguistic gender does not necessarily align with biological or social gender, and it is crucial to distinguish between grammatical gender and actual gender identities.

Modern linguistics has moved away from associating languages with specific genders and acknowledges that gendered features in language are arbitrary and unrelated to biological sex or gender identity. The understanding of language has evolved to recognize that linguistic features are a product of complex historical, cultural, and linguistic factors, rather than inherent reflections of masculinity or femininity.

In general, Otto Jespersen described the English language as masculine primarily due to its grammatical features and vocabulary, which he believed reflected masculine qualities. However, it is important to approach his characterization with a critical lens, understanding that gender associations in language are socially constructed and can vary across different cultures and historical periods. Linguistic gender is distinct from biological or social gender, and modern linguistics recognizes the arbitrariness of gendered features in language.

*****

👉 Semantic Changes | in English Language

👉 French influence | on the English language

👉 Interpellation: | an ideology of Marxism

👉 Phallocentrism, | a discussion in the light of 'Feminism'

👉 Feminism, | a concept in terms of Sex and Gender

👉 Imperialism and Colonialism – | Postcolonial Studies